Ramadaan : Understanding Television
What Can Be Done?
- By Khalid Baig
Television has spread like a wild fire in the world, including the Muslim
world. It seems to have overcome the limitations of space and time.
Consider place. In Saudi Arabia, one can find the imprints of Hollywood only a
few yards away from the Haram, the most sacred of all sanctuaries of Islam.
Videocassettes are easily available at stores. A hotel attendant, at a walking
distance from the Haram al-Sharif in Makkah can be found busy watching English
movies on the television in his office even as the prayers are going on. At the
Jeddah airport, the Umrah pilgrims can watch a European beauty contest courtesy
of an Egyptian TV channel being broadcast to the airport television sets.
Consider time. Ramadan is the most sacred month in the Islamic calendar, a
period of time that is to be devoted to direct acts of worship of Allah. Yet,
during Ramadan, believers around the world can be found glued to their
television sets when they should be busy making dua, doing dhikr and tilawa or
offering nafl prayers.
Or consider the time of suffering. Hardly a day goes by when we do not get the
news of pain and suffering from Palestine, Kashmir, Iraq, Chechnya, Afghanistan,
or a dozen other hot spots around the globe. Yet, between all the suffering and
grieving that accompanies the tragedy, the dish antennas on the rooftops have
been flourishing. In the past at times of catastrophes people would turn to
Allah, would stop going to the cinema houses, and would repent from sins, even
though temporarily. Today, there is an ever-increasing appetite for the
television fun. This is also true in the lands closest to the areas of
suffering. On days when a strike is called to protest Indian atrocities in
Kashmir, the video stores in Karachi run out of videos of Indian movies.
Throughout the world religious, moral and social values have been drastically
undermined by this great "technological gift" of the century. And
entire nations seem to be helplessly "enjoying" the invasion. When
people are doing nothing, they watch television. When they are doing something
else, they still have television in the background. The device has contributed
to the addition of a new space in the architecture of the private home: the TV
lounge. It is a space where perfect strangers come to pedal nudity, immorality,
and hedonism. This is the space, which increasingly controls the entire house.
It is fashionable to complain about "excessive" sex and violence on
television. Even those who make money from this enterprise willingly do that.
CNN tycoon Ted Turner said in July 93 before a U.S Congressional subcommittee:
"I don't need experts to tell me that the amount of violence on television
today and its increasingly graphic portrayal can be harmful to children.
Television violence is the single most significant factor contributing to
violence in America." And a poll released in February 95 in the U.S. by
Children Now, whose directors include TV producers and Warner Brothers Chairman,
reported that most children believe that what they see on television encourages
fornication, disrespect for parents, telling lies, and aggressive behavior.
The most significant thing here is that what the TV industry wants us to discuss
(and we willingly follow) is what is ON television, not television itself.
Everyone will wholeheartedly agree with the problems with TV programs and offer
all kinds of advice. (Watch the programs with your children. Tell them what is
wrong. Be critical. Be creative.) Irrational and meaningless as it is, this
exercise will nonetheless soothe your irritation. In the meantime, keep on
watching. It is fun. It is also unavoidable.
In about two decades, this "wonderful" technical development has
played havoc with societies around the globe. But what is even more
unprecedented is the ambivalence with which these societies face this greatest
of all invasions. Underlying this is a strongly held belief that television is a
neutral tool that can be used with equal facility for good or evil.
Unfortunately, this position has been taken without any critical examination of
the facts. It is about time that we approached the subject with an open
mind.Neutral Tool?
Is technology ever neutral? "[Every technology] has within its physical
form a predisposition toward being used in certain ways and not others,"
writes Niel Postman, chair of the department of Communication Arts at New York
University. "Only those who know nothing of the history of technology
believe that a technology is entirely neutral." (Amusing Ourselves to
Death, 1985).
What about television? It reflects the idea that serious discourse can be
carried out through pictures instead of words. As Postman explains: "The
single most important fact about television is that people watch it, which is
why it is called ‘television.' And what they watch, and like to watch, are
moving pictures__ millions of them, of short duration and dynamic variety. It is
in the nature of the medium that it must suppress the content of ideas in order
to accommodate the requirements of visual interest."
Words and pictures do not occupy the same universe of discourse. A piece of
writing requires one to go beyond the shape of the letters to read them. It
requires thought to understand what is being said. Television does not require
reflection, in fact it does not even permit it. That is why little children can
spend hours in front of the mini screen. Television can titillate, it cannot
teach. It can bring images into our heart, not ideas into our mind. It appeals
to the emotions, not the intellect.
But isn't a picture worth a thousand words? Is it? It is important to note that
this claim itself is made in words. A picture cannot make any claims. For
reason, arguments, claims, and judgment belong in the universe of words not
pictures. That is why advertisers love pictures. Consider an ad for, say,
Coca-Cola, that just shows young people singing, dancing, having fun, and
enjoying the drink. The audiences make the connection between happiness and
Coke. This ad cannot be refuted. It makes no claim, so there is nothing to
refute.Medium Is The Message
The above explains Marshal McLuhan's famous aphorism. The inherent, built in
biases of a medium allow certain types of messages and not others. The
communication is conditioned by the medium. It is enhanced or distorted by it.
The medium is the message. And when the medium is TV, the message is
Entertainment. As Postman notes: "Entertainment is the supra ideology of
all discourse on television." Whether it is news, science, religion, or
education, if it is happening on TV, it must follow the dictates of
entertainment.
In fact, a new term has been coined indicating a blend of education and
entertainment: Edutainment. It smells like the language problem of a TV baby.
But remember that it is already being used by the serious press. Which suggests
that edutainment will produce even more edutainment!Like A Drug
Actually, TV is not just another kind of entertainment either. As a project by
the National Institute of Mental Health in the U.S. involving 1200 subjects in
nine studies over a 13 year period found in 1990, television is like a drug. The
researchers asked the subjects, ages 10 to 82, to note down their activities and
moods every time a beeper was activated, which was done randomly. The
researchers found that when people sit down to watch TV, particularly for long
periods, they tend to be in low moods. The longer they watch, the less able they
are to concentrate. As time goes on, they grow sadder, lonelier, more irritable,
and more hostile. Although people are relaxed when the television set is on,
when they turn it off, they are less relaxed than before they began, "much
like a drug that makes people feel better while they are doing it but worse
afterward." And just like a drug the weaker segments of the society are its
greatest target. Thus in the U.S. blacks tend to watch more TV than whites. And
now thanks to satellite TV transmissions over which the poor countries have no
control, the rest of the world is being turned into the U.S. black under
class.Islamic Work And Television
Can this dangerous drug be somehow converted into a medicine? Not too long ago,
a young professional in the U.S. approached prominent Muslim scholar and Deputy
Cairman of the Jeddah based Islamic Fiqh Council of the Organization of Islamic
Conference (OIC), Justice Taqi Usmani to inquire about his profession. He
produced computer graphics for the television and motion picture industry. This
is the age of the media, and the only effective way to spread Islam today is
through television and movies, he argued. If we do not learn the trade how shall
we be able to produce such programs and if we don't who will, he inquired. Yet,
some people had told him that it was not a good profession.
"I have given a lot of anxious thought to this issue," replied Justice
Usmani in his characteristic measured tone, weighing every word. "And I
have reached the conclusion that the cause of Islam cannot be served through
television, especially under the current circumstances. You should seek another
line of work."
Frankly, there are lot of enthusiasts who may be totally bewildered by this
answer for it challenges both conventional wisdom as well as some dearly held
dreams. They may even consider anyone making this suggestion as belonging to the
Flat Earth Society: backward, anti-progress, ignorant of today's realities. Let
us grant them their day in court and look at their case objectively.
The enthusiasts have shown interest in three primary areas. The first deals with
propagation of Islam. There are lots of sincere Muslims putting lot of hope in a
yet-to-be-released video that will attract the people of the world to Islam by
the thousands. They are simply confusing Dawah with propaganda! Dawah means
inviting people to the Straight Path by relaying the True Message to them
without any distortion. It is a very serious message and requires a serious
medium to deliver it. The message is for their own benefit and what they do with
it is their own business. Our job is done once we have communicated the message
correctly. Our job is not to manipulate people into submission to Allah any more
than it is to coerce them into it. A Dawah worker is a teacher, a propagandist
is a manipulator. Television is a good tool for manipulating, not for teaching.
The second area deals with the education ("edutainment") of children.
Many videos have already been produced for this purpose. In one program from a
popular series of such videos, a puppet named Adam drives a skateboard to the
mosque. Scenes of Adam doing his antics are mixed with the videos of real
children praying. But there is no doubt that Adam is the hero of this story.
Here is a clear case of the medium distorting the message. The children who
learn to pray this way may learn the mechanics of Salat, but they would have
paid a terrible price for it. The idea of Salat will be associated in their mind
with the images of puppets, skateboards, and the idea of fun. Missing will be
the spiritual dimension of prayer, the solemnness and grace of this pillar of
Islam. Such videos are very popular as they help assuage the guilt feelings of
parents over their failure to control the TV in the first place.
To be fair there is a useful role for these videos but it is not normally
perceived. Doctors use nicotine patches to help their patients stop smoking.
Nicotine is not a medicine, but it becomes therapeutic under the circumstances.
Similarly, the TV addicts may be helped by such videos to get over their
addiction. It might work if that is the goal. But this is very different from
the view that here is a Brave New Way of teaching Islam. The children and their
parents must realize that ultimately they have to learn their religion the old
fashioned way: read books, listen to lectures, work hard.
The third type of videos are used by relief organizations showing the terrible
situation of Muslims in Kashmir, Bosnia, Palestine and elsewhere. The intentions
are noble, the results look great. But someone must ask the hard question: Why
should the Muslims need disaster pornography before they can come to the help of
their brothers and sisters? What are the implications of this practice for both
present and future?
There are, of course, cases where the TV is being used against its grain, where
the only video is that of a talking head. Such Islamic programs in Egypt or
Saudi Arabia, as elsewhere, may not contain all the dangers cited above, solely
because there the TV is being used just as an expensive radio. The problem is
such programs will not be able to withstand the onslaught of CNN or MTV, of
dazzling colors and dynamic pictures. The question remains how long can you use
a tool against its grain?
The simple fact is that no one buys a TV and VCR because they desperately wanted
to learn about Islam and it was the best way of doing it. The TV lounge is not a
study room and all the Islamic videos in the world are not going to make it one.
It is a peace of Hollywood. The rest is camouflage or self-deception. The
earlier we get out of it, the better.What Can Be Done?Television is powerful. It
is everywhere. Is there anything that us mortals can do about it? The answer is
yes. Things can be done at individual, as well as collective levels. At the
individual level, try using the ON/OFF switch. It takes some effort and will
power, but the device can be turned off. The key is to involve the entire
family. Those nervous about the idea may rest assured that there is no known
disease linked to lack of exposure to TV! Also those who have tried it know that
it becomes easier with time. Community Organizations and Islamic Schools can
help by educating the people about the perils of watching TV, countering the
social pressures, and providing healthy alternatives.
Ramadan: The TV Free Month. Our best chance of kicking the television habit
comes in Ramadan every year. It is the time of year when every Muslim who has
any trace of Iman in his or her heart, is naturally inclined toward doing good
and staying away from evil. And it should be like that. Did not the Prophet,
Sall-Allahu alayhi wa sallam, curse the Muslim who finds Ramadan but does not
use it to seek forgiveness for his previous sins? If we cannot leave sins or
vain activities during Ramadan, when can we? We not only have the strongest
moral and religious reasons to do so, it is also easy because the regular
activities of Ramadan leave little time to be wasted in front of television.
Muslim organizations and communities will do a great service by launching a
campaign to declare Ramadan as the TV free month. Urge all the Muslims in your
community to turn it off for at least one month. And who knows, after one month
many may decide to stay away from it because of the personal insights they got
through the experience.
Of course, if you are convinced, do not wait until the next Ramadan. Start
today.